Hello all,
> > I just set up an automated build process for the CHM manuals. If this
> > works out fine, I'm able to build the CHM manuals every week or so. It's
a
> > start and forget script.
Great, I think a weekly update is really good.
> OK. :) Are you XSLT ready? Perhaps I can speed up
> the generation, by using
>
> xml ---XSLT stylesheets---> HTML to use directly in chm
Well, I think the 1st priority is to provide actual manuals, which seems to
work now.
If you can/want provide a faster way via XSLT, I think it's welcomed by
everybody as long as it doesn't change the current building-process for the
e.g. html-manuals (if it isn't changed there also meanwhile :).
> I have seen Jirka Kosek's work on this, and it is promising.
> Well, Hartmut said before, that maybe we will move
> to XSLT style sheets (partly ready by Jirka Kosek) from
> the DSSSL ones, as they are much more easy.
I didn't check them yet, but it doesn't matter to me which tools I use, they
only should be common ("the official group-tool").
> Well, I am far more familiar with XSLT as with DSSSL,
> so this would be much better to me.
For me it's the other way round: I've just learned DSSSL, but I don't have
any problem to learn XSLT as well.
Cu,
Thomas
