> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > With xml, they are all colored blue... with me, that is, and that's not
> > vim60 apparantly. I don't know which version sysop installed... I'll ask
> > them to upgrade.
>
> Type :version.
5.6.70 on the main server (where I work), 5.7 on other computers.
> > I notice that the emacs comment is also mode-sgml, and not xml.
> >
> >
> > So, you are right, it should be xml from a meaning viewpoint. But the
point
> > of that line is ease-for-the-user. For vim < 6, syntax=sgml works, and
> > syntax=xml doesn't.
> >
> > I noticed in the source of PHP a differentiation between vim6+ and
vim<6, is
> > that appropriate here?
>
> Sure.
Can you mail me the appropriate vim-line for version 6 then, in which at
least tag coloring works fine? And indent would be nice too :-)
For vim5, I think syntax=sgml is the best choice, or do you disagree?
> > By the way, one question: How is the sgml rendering with vim600? Also
okay,
> > or really bad? Is xml better than sgml there?
>
> I haven't tried sgml too much. XML works great for me, especially with
> indenting.
I'll definitely need to upgrade :-)
Thanks for the info,
Jeroen
