> did i get you right, you just do not want them as comment in the
> translated files, right?
Read the REAME file :) $Revison type of comments are only useful
in english file, as they help the translators.
> They aren't in te other translated files either, so i actually
> do not know, why Egon has set this one. Maybe just, because i
> forgot to erase it from the original when i translated the file.
> - confusing - I will remove it again.
I think he would like to prove that this thing is bad. Although
we haven't talked about these comments to be useful in translated
files earlier.
> Can you shortly tell me about the EN-Revision comment thing you
> talked about? i haven't read this one ... ;)
Wuh. I have written many letters, and long explanations and
examples about these comments. You should check some out in the
archives. To be short, there is a proposed way of putting all
the information stored now in the Translators files in the
individual XML files.
Like you store a line in Translators, like:
array.xml Thomas Schöfbeck fertig (bis V 1.72)
You can also store this in the array.xml file itself, as:
<!-- EN-Revision: 1.72 Maintainer: tom Status: ready -->
Note that I used the CVS user name of Thomas, and the
english status message. This way we can generate a table
(see the ones attached to my previous mails), which is
much better, than the current Translators files, and there
are numerous advantages [IMHO] of storing the revision
informatio in the file itself, instead of an external
storage place. Read my previous mails about the subject
for better explanation.
Goba
