BTW Goba, can we make things move for the notes maintenance ? Two things : 2 - The notes system
From the same URL, topic "3. User note handling"
When deleting :
- outdated : for example, a note helping to configure some library with PHP 3.X, a note using a function that is no more part of PHP.
- replying : the note is a reply to another note asking for help. The original note should be hunted down and rejected (as stated in the HOWTO)
So should the reply, IMNSHO.
- bogus : for example, a note giving an example for a mysql_* function on a mssql_* function page.
- trash : spam, bad words, an _old_ (more than 6 months is a good limit) note asking for help, a non-english note, a note that should be rejected but have a wrong email address ..
- duplicated : there's already a note saying the same thing, differently. If there's a lot of duplicated entries stating the same thing, we should think about integrating the note in the manual
- added : the note content was added to the manual. We can even send a mail to the note submitter, giving him a link to the updated CVS file and thanking him for his add-on.
When rejecting : - support : a note asking for help
Uhm, see above?
Here's how I think of the notes: Unless it helps *me* somehow, someday, it doesn't belong.
-Bop
Ronald Chmara, Ronin Professional Consulting LLC
520-326-6109, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?" --Joshua
-- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
