On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > >> > > > > Not to discourage your or something, but there are much better > > candidates for documentation :) (See attached list) > > Hello Derick! > Thanks for your feedback. I picked ircg_ from the nodoku.php link > (previously provided by didou). > > Many of the functions in your file do not appear on the Zend nodoku.php > file, is it normal or .. ?
That file is outdated then :) I did a grep for all 'documented functions' with the entitie "undocumented.func", i think zend's list doesn't pick that up. > My only fear is that, without a proto definition, I might run into > serious troubles during the tests and code sample. > > By all means if you have another link I would be more then happy to > work on the priorities first. That said, I will probably finish up the > ircg_ family. > I spent about 3 hours on setup, tests etc. and I should be able to > complete them all in a couple of days. > > I could then move to curl, imap et all from your list if you do have a > proto definition. You can find those here: http://cvs.php.net/co.php/phpdoc/funcsummary.txt?login=2&r=1.24 or as the file "funcsummary.txt" inthe phpdoc checkout. regards, Derick
