> > I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the main > > page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active and who > > isn't. > > There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see > around 90 letters from you (including CVS commits and bug actions) in my > local phpdoc mailbox (which contains letters for the complete last > year). > Yes fine, but what criteria was used to gague "activity"? I know it's not raw number of commits because I followed the thread closely enough to know that we weren't being so silly as to include 2 character spelling corrections.
Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and documentation.
