> > > I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the > main > > > page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active and > who > > > isn't. > > > > There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see > > around 90 letters from you (including CVS commits and bug actions) in my > > local phpdoc mailbox (which contains letters for the complete last > > year). > > > Yes fine, but what criteria was used to gague "activity"? I know it's not > raw number of commits because I followed the thread closely enough to know > that we weren't being so silly as to include 2 character spelling > corrections. > > Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It > minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and > documentation.
Hello Sara, We all know you are a great developper :) When you write a new function, you commit its documentation in the following second. If all developpers do this.... I could retire myself :) You have also written most of stream's docs. I'm not sure either if your name should go to the active's list or not, but... I'm not against :) Nuno
