ID:               30576
 Updated by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reported By:      stapleton dot 41 at rheamuvethees dot osu dot edu
-Status:           Open
+Status:           Closed
 Bug Type:         Documentation problem
 Operating System: Any
 PHP Version:      Irrelevant
 New Comment:

This bug has been fixed in the documentation's XML sources. Since the
online and downloadable versions of the documentation need some time
to get updated, we would like to ask you to be a bit patient.

Thank you for the report, and for helping us make our documentation
better.




Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-10-28 11:13:17] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

He's right, this should be fixed in the manual. We can not
discriminate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-10-28 11:05:48] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It's better to use C or other lower level language for genetic
analysis, isn't it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-10-27 06:17:12] stapleton dot 41 at rheamuvethees dot osu dot edu

Description:
------------
The following clause, while cute, should be removed: "and nobody
serious would be doing genetic analysis with PHP"

Sadly, many serious people use the obtusificated (spelling?) languate
Perl for many tasks such as this, however, in many ways I find PHP is
better than Perl (even for string handling) in the way it operates,
programs can be written faster, and sometimes run faster, are easier to
read and modify. OOP in PHP is much nicer as well. I have done this
professionally for a while, using both Perl and PHP for the tasks I had
to do, and PHP was definetly the easier option for making said programs,
even without using OOP (which seemed to slow it down).

Reproduce code:
---------------
n/a

Expected result:
----------------
n/a

Actual result:
--------------
n/a


------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=30576&edit=1

Reply via email to