On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> No need to. We usually "bogus" translation bugs, it's simple not > >> up-to-date and there are other tools for the translation team to see > >> that. > > > > We shouldn't bogusify all translation bugs. A typo is a typo. > > The best is to leave the bug to the translators. > > But when it is simply outdated, there is no need to leave the bugs open, as > we have revcheck.
Right, and that's the case here. We can perhaps add subcatgories for the different translations, so that the correct mailinglist get's the email. Whould that work? Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
