> The X-Spam-Status isn't always the same :) its almost the same.. I have > already seen one different :) The spamassassin needs training to be > useful to us.
Well, that may gain some accuracy, but I stand by my idea that spamassassin will not work properly for notes because SA is designed to handle mail (this is obvious when notes fail a test like "DATE_MISSING,FROM_NO_LOWER" > The IPs are correct. the server IP should belong to a PHP.net mirror and > the probable submiter is the IP that sent the note to the php.net mirror > (unless someone is posting notes directly without using the mirrors). Ok. The reason I asked is because a large number of notes seem to be coming from RIPE-owned IPs. I just submitted one, and my ISP showed up. ... Anyway, what I'm getting at is: - notes are broken (we already agree on this) - spammers submit notes from open proxies and zombie machines Perhaps we could scan submitting IP addresses for open proxies before accepting a note? The user would have to consent to this scan. Thoughts? S
