>> Several return types are wrong (even in the source protos). But don't >> worry about it, I'll fix that after commit with my tool.
Edward Z. Yang wrote: > Hmm... that's interesting. I actually had to add a few new protos and > fix a few incorrect summaries when I ran the script. I'll probably have > to deal with them when I comb through each function and add detailed > documentation, so it would be helpful if I knew about it now. Here is it. Most of them are just boolean instead of bool or long instead of int but there are also some real errors. Jakub Vrana
svn-protos.tgz
Description: application/compressed
