On Jan 9, 2008 1:57 PM, Simion Onea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > While translating the file "appendices/migration52.xml" I found an > interesting situation in the lists of new/changed functions in different > extensions. > For example, take lines 736 and 746. They mention two functions in the SPL > and XMLReader extensions respectively: > array iterator_to_array(Traversable it [, bool use_keys = true]) > and > <function>XMLReader::open</function> > > Notice that in one case the complete function definition is used, while in > the second case only the function name is used. > There are many such situations in this file. What should we do in this case? > I think it would be good to bring them to a common format and apply the > necessary tags. > I can take this task.
If the function isn't documented yet then I think the full funcsynopsis is needed, for documented functions it is enough to name the function (and the new parameter when appropriate). -Hannes
