Hi,
I'm not a big contributor (in fact, haven't done much more than test
PhD and send some feedback) but I do work with the raw documentation
quite a bit.
I've found some apparent irregularities in how classes are documented.
For example, the tidy.html has both procedural and OO versions of the
function. The procedural version follows the convention found in other
function definitions but the OO version seems to be missing the
CLASSSYNOPSIS, OOCLASS, etc. elements thus there is no way to select
just the OO methods.
Is there an exemplary class definition in the existing documentation I
could use as a foundation for fixing the structure of the Tidy classes
(and other classes that I periodically run across with odd structure)?
Thanks in advance.
Ted Stresen-Reuter
http://tedmasterweb.com
