On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 23:33, Daniel Convissor <dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote: > Hi Philip: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:20:48PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote: >> >> On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote: >> >> > The files in phpdoc/doc-base/trunk/RFC/skeletons use the old >> > documentation structure. Should these files be updated, or should the be >> > eliminated? >> >> They should be up-to-date, so what exactly is wrong with them? The >> online editor now uses them as official resources, too. > > Some of the files are using the old <chapter><section> layout rather than > the new <refentry><refsect1> one. For example, see examples.xml. Or am > I misunderstanding what files like examples.xml are for?
"edge cases" like examples.xml could be out of date, and should be updated. The "important ones" like method.xml, book.xml, setup.xml and friends should be the latest and greatest version. -Hannes
