On 28 July 2010 12:31, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 13:24, Richard Quadling <rquadl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2010 12:08, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you take care of bumping the revision for the translation (if it
>>> was already up2date) then thats fine.
>>>
>>> -Hannes
>>>
>>
>> So, for a file in /en ...
>>
>> <!-- $Revision: 297028 $ -->
>>
>> and in /es (randomly chosen), the same file has ...
>>
>> <!-- $Revision: 297973 $ -->
>> <!-- EN-Revision: 297028 Maintainer: jpberdejo Status: ready -->
>>
>> As the revisions match, I can make the change to both files.
>>
>> I assume I commit /en and get the revision and then do the same
>> changes to the /es and update EN-Revision.
>
> Correct
>
>
>> What about for translations NOT uptodate? Which I suspect will be a
>
> Not bumping revision, but still make the change. It will be up to the
> translator to figure out the untranslated changeset and sync it and
> then bump the revision.
>
> -Hannes
>

But not worth doing until PhD is released with the functionality to
support <void/> as a return type.

Reply via email to