On 28 July 2010 12:31, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 13:24, Richard Quadling <rquadl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 28 July 2010 12:08, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If you take care of bumping the revision for the translation (if it >>> was already up2date) then thats fine. >>> >>> -Hannes >>> >> >> So, for a file in /en ... >> >> <!-- $Revision: 297028 $ --> >> >> and in /es (randomly chosen), the same file has ... >> >> <!-- $Revision: 297973 $ --> >> <!-- EN-Revision: 297028 Maintainer: jpberdejo Status: ready --> >> >> As the revisions match, I can make the change to both files. >> >> I assume I commit /en and get the revision and then do the same >> changes to the /es and update EN-Revision. > > Correct > > >> What about for translations NOT uptodate? Which I suspect will be a > > Not bumping revision, but still make the change. It will be up to the > translator to figure out the untranslated changeset and sync it and > then bump the revision. > > -Hannes >
But not worth doing until PhD is released with the functionality to support <void/> as a return type.