Hi all, Sorry to jump into this, but :
Sigurd Nes a écrit : > >> From: Dave Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 2008-03-04 15:02:00 CET >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Coordination Team >> >> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:30 +0100, Sigurd Nes wrote: >>>> From: Dave Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: 2008-03-04 13:39:41 CET >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Coordination Team >>>> >>>> On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:56 +0100, Sigurd Nes wrote: >>>>> I'm happy with the team - it's just that sometimes I could wish I had >>>>> a vote in decision processes rather than being told afterwards that >>>>> some policy >>>>> has changed. >>>> I am not sure which policies you are referring to. The policies of the >>>> project and release goals for 0.9.18 haven't really changed for a long >>>> time. >>> Well - how about licensing GPLv2 vs. GPLv3. (or what about AGPL?) >> GPLv3 is a requirement of being a GNU package and was discussed here >> back in July last year. The AGPL is a great license for something like >> phpgw, but without rewriting large chunks of code we can't use it. > > Could we have things like that in the Developers Guide ? I'm not sure to understand what you mean here ... "things like that" is for the fact that being a GNU package has some well known constraints (and lot's advantages IMHO), or that if you want to put some pieces of code under another Licence than the official one it should be GPLv3 Compliant ? Or another thing ? Regards, Caeies. _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
