Le vendredi 02 mai 2008 à 15:51 +0200, Sigurd Nes a écrit : > > There has been som mention of grouping apps into something as: > * Core - the core modules which should be installed for all installs > * Maintained - actively maintained and developed modules > * supported - gets security and critical bug fixes > * Orphaned - use at own risk > > I think this is a good structure - and if others also others agree on this > one - we should decide upon which apps falls into which group. > > trunk and future versions > > Regards > > Sigurd
Just a quick comment (from a third party ;). I seem to recall that "core" was mentioned previously as being the set of "core groupware applications" that make phpgroupware a groupware solution. So maybe it does mean email + calendar + addressbook, etc., and not just the api + complementary libs that other modules need for running/ In what you describe, I believe the categorization is drawn more with respect to QA (maintainability status), rather than features... but I'm not sure I got it right. Is this what you were thinking of ? Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*NEW ADDRESS*) http://www-inf.it-sudparis.eu/~olberger/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM / TELECOM & Management SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
