That makes sense. Lets move it out of head and into a branch. On 11 May, 15:25, "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/07, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Simon, yes I did. I had been assured that this would be ok because > > the 'development in a branch' approach is really only necessary for > > native extension code (because pecl4win always pulls this from HEAD). > > Let me know if you think the binding should go elsewhere. > > > On 11 May, 14:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Nice Graham. Don't have any feedback yet but a quick question. Did you > > > mean to check it into HEAD rather than the branch? > > > > Simon > > > I guess it's OK as we are just about to put another release. You are right > > about the pecl4win thing so any php changes in HEAD will not affect the dlls > that people download. However as we have this rather strange situation where > we release from HEAD and develop in a branch rather than the other way round > HEAD is our live representation of the last release so if we have to make a > quick fix that's where we would do it. I guess we could make a branch from > the release lable if we really had to but that's starting to get > complicated. If we start developing code in two places it just gets really > complicated IMHO. > > Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
