[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I do see what you're saying Paul and we do have to be careful in cases > like these. I think if we were stepping outside of the various > specifications we would be on very dodgy ground. It's a balance > between supporting the schema that people already have (they most > likely use our technology if they have to change their schema to use
they most likely >won't< use our technology .. ? > it) and not making it too easy for people to store up problems for > themselves as you say. Now we have a bug report for this I'll raise > one in Tuscany and see what the SDO community say. They may come back > with the same concerns that you have. The OP has some xml which validates against a schema, and which the XML DAS consumes without a murmur but then Tuscany throws a confusing exception when he tries to reference an element using valid PHP syntax, which works for simplexml, dom and so on. This doesn't seem good enough to me, and if we can't do any more because of Tuscany limitations, we should at least provide an explanatory message documenting the restriction - fortunately he worked out the cause of the problem for himself. I raised this on the Tuscany list (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/25795), and Pete is having a think about the implications. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
