Hi Silvano, Sorry for not replying sooner and not replying to your original note. I always had in mind to generate documentation in the WSDL from the methods descriptions, so what you have done is exactly the right idea.
Thanks also for the patch. I haven't taken a look at the moment. The SCA_SDO project has a CLA to cover contributions and so far as I'm aware you've not signed, or been asked to sign it. Is this something you'd be willing and able to do? I can give you more information in needed. Regards, Graham. On 30 May, 17:05, "Silvano Girardi Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I got no comments, I made it only for methods and not optional. > > I've put the patch in the case. > > Silvano > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Silvano Girardi Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > wrote: > > >> >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote: > > >> >>> is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the > >> >>> <documentation></documentation> in the WSDL based on the method's > >> >>> description in the doc block? > >> >> Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any > >> volunteers? > > >> > I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my > >> spare > >> > time. > > >> > I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going > >> to > >> > do this. > >> > Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put > >> > here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you > >> guys > >> > handle these things). > > >> > Anyway, I am a volunteer :) > > >> > Silvano > > >> Great :-) > >> Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at > >>http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have > >> a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it. > > > Ok I just did it:http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775 > > > Need your thoughts here. > > > 1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in the > > request above), or only for methods? > > 2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle > > this? > > > Silvano --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
