[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

[Samuel Robert Reid]

GPL itself says output from a GPL program is not covered: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput Sam Reid Michael Heuer wrote: allain wrote: My reasons for wanting to do this are: - Obviously Code Coverage Metrics are good but this one is IDE agnostic. - It has a Hudson plugin that can be installed allowing us to diagram the (hopefully) increasing progression of code coverage over time in a nice convenient graph. http://wiki.hudson-ci.org//display/HUDSON/Cobertura+Plugin The _javascript_ code used in the Cobertura reports themselves are licensed under the GPL, and there was concern in e.g. the Apache Commons community that distributing those reports violates the terms of the license. You may find some discussion threads in archives of the commons-dev mailing list. I can't recall what the resolution of the issue was though. michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Piccolo2D Developers Group: http://groups.google.com/group/piccolo2d-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---