Hi,The docs on the 'sort' function says "Sorts lst by destructively exchanging its elements." From this I get the impression that
(let L (3 2 5 4) (sort L) L) should give the same result as (let L (3 2 5 4) (sort L)) but that's not so, as the first one reveals that L get the value(3 4 5), while the (more expected) value returned by the (sort L) itself was (2 3 4 5). Why couldn't L simply be given the same value?
/Jon -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
