On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Alexander Burger wrote: > > But more important is that this would require quite a mess of code, > analog to what is there for getting the values of public fields. If you > look at lines 99 through 142 of "ersatz/fun.src" (actual version), you > see a lot of tedious type ('instanceof') checks. And they don't even > cover all possible cases! The same would be required for the opposite > direction. Or does anybody know a better way?
Is this related to introspection? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2044446/java-introspection-and-reflection // Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe