On March 7, 2012 at 8:30 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
> Hi Jon, > > > How many percent (very roughly) of the PicoLisp functions are depending on > > this 'native' function? If it's less than say 10%, one could probably find > > an alternative solution for these "natives", or just ignore them. I'm only > > guessing. > > The interpreter itself doesn't depend on 'native' at all. The base > system runs fine without it. > > Only add-ons like floating point math, or the OpenGL library, do need > it. I think PicoLisp is plenty fun and useful also without these addons. Floating point could be reimplemented in other ways if really needed. best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
