Henrik Sarvell <hsarv...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Henrik,
> When developing web apps I keep the code for the server and the rest > separate and reload the rest on every request. No need for restarts at > all that way. interesting idea, not sure how you actually do that, but would make things smoother in the not so rare case of reaching a 'bad' state during development. > Unless you're actually fiddling with the actual server code, then it > can't be helped I suppose... I don't, so that would not be a problem. > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Thorsten Jolitz > <tjol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Rowan Thorpe <ro...@rowanthorpe.com> > writes: > > >> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:22:14 +0200 > >> Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> ..[snip].. I ran into this problem when experimenting with the > >> web-framework and my app got into a bad state. When restarting > >> then, PicoLisp tells me something like 'Port is already used', > >> so I tried to kill the still running (*) PicoLisp processes > >> with a simple 'kill PID', but to no avail. > >> > >> [* are they still running? 'ps' shows them with a '?', and I > >> shutted them down on the command-line, so they shouldn't. But > >> somehow they still block the port, and the more I shut down, > >> the more are shown by 'ps'] ..[snip].. > > > > Sorry for asking the obvious question, but have you waited the > > couple of minutes needed for the kernel (depending on which > > kernel) to eventually clean orphaned ports itself? It *may* > > actually just be the port remaining open because the owning > > process didn't cleanly shut it?: as mentioned here > > http://superuser.com/a/127865 > > > Not obvious for me, obviously, but definitely the right question - > no I did not wait, and I did not know I have to wait a couple of > minutes. > > So thats probably the root of the problem, unrelated to PicoLisp. > Though a bit of a hassle, since it takes away the huge advantage > of PicoLisp's millisecond start-up time somehow, and shutting down > a PicoLisp process and restart is not a prime option anymore if a > couple of minutes waiting are involved. > > Thanks for the interesting link! > > > > -- > cheers, > Thorsten > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe > > > -- cheers, Thorsten -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
