Hi Henrik, > Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel > (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs.
Right, though adding to 'dbs' makes only sense for indexes (i.e. as you did with the (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) below). > That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed > the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database > refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!>. Strange. This should definitely work. There must be some other problem. Can you try to debug it more? Is there an error? For example, 'put!>' will complain in the 'has>' method if the relation is not known. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
