Oh, you mean the 32 bit version of pico lisp? Thats right… On 06 Aug 2014, at 23:23, Jorge Acereda Maciá <jacer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It’s a 64bit 8 GB machine. BSDs work differently: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/basics-processeshtml > > Maximum seems to be 99999, at least on FreeBSD. > > On 06 Aug 2014, at 23:09, Henrik Sarvell <hsarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jorge, how much RAM does it have, is it a 64bit machine? >> >> I have checked the number Alex mentioned on some of our servers, all >> running Ubuntu 12.04, servers below 64GB RAM have that number set to >> 32768 per default, machines with 128GB got 98304. >> >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jorge Acereda Maciá <jacer...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I’m getting pids well above 64k on my laptop (OS X). >>> >>> On 06 Aug 2014, at 22:33, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Randall, >>>> >>>>> I believe that modern Linux and FreeBSD implementations use 32 bit >>>>> ints for the pid_t. >>>> >>>> Right. >>>> >>>>> There will never be that many processes on a 32 bit >>>>> OS, but since they just go forward until they wrap, getting a pid bigger >>>>> than 16 bits is probably even to be expected. >>>> >>>> However, they don't plainly wrap. There is a system limit in the kernel, >>>> controlled via "/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max". >>>> >>>> Even on 64-bit machines (where pid_t is also an 'int', i.e. a 64-bit >>>> number), PIDs don't get up to such huge numbers. >>>> >>>> ♪♫ Alex >>>> -- >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >>> >>> -- >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subjectUnsubscribe >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
