On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Alexander Williams <a...@unscramble.co.jp> wrote: > Everyone's comments are valid, but we need to remember: > > For PicoLisp's user base to grow, lowering barriers to entry should be the > first priority.
The choice of the repo wouldn't have any effect on pure picolisp users, but on developers or translators of the language. Except maybe for contributing to documentation. Personaly, I'd prefer git/GitHub since I already tried to contribute to a project on BitBucket but failed miserably. Anyway, I'm more a user than a dev of picolisp. https://code.google.com/p/support-tools/wiki/MigratingToBitbucket seems to require several steps. https://code.google.com/export-to-github/ seems to be more automated, but: «The Google Code Exporter is experiencing extremely high traffic. The export queue is full. Please come back later. » chri -- http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site pro) http://delicious.com/profgraorg (liens, favoris) https://twitter.com/profgraorg http://microalg.info -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
