Thanks Alex, I shall study that example. Denis
---------------------------------------- > From: a...@software-lab.de > To: picolisp@software-lab.de > Subject: Re: The database as a "dictionary"? > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:03:31 +0100 > > Hi Denis, > >> Programming all manually? What I like about picolisp is that when >> there is no code which does exactly what I want, I still can easily >> develop a clean solution from scratch instead of writing some ugly >> hacks. :-) I mean, I would not use the DB if I were to believe I would >> have to hack around classes like +Joint or +Link, but being disappointed >> with +Sn would not be a problem, as I would only have to extend the DB >> not to "fight" against it. > > Yes, it is not uncommon to write application-specific index classes. For > example, if you look into the sources of the picolisp.com Wiki at > http://software-lab.de/wiki.tgz, you find that it builds a '+MupIdx' > ("Markup index") in "wiki/er.l" > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
