Hi Abel,

Great work, I'll give it a shot on  pg 10 and 11 later today at work.  As
for the mailing lists, I'd start with pgsql-general mailing list before the
-hackers list, the same core devs watch both lists so you'll get the same
high grade advice.  They'll let you know if you should promote the issue to
-hackers.  The main advantage is, you'll get many more eyeballs on -general
and it's more appropriate given it's not a core dev issue.

-Michel

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:05 PM Abel Normand <abel.ze.norm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks all for your suggestions, I will open respective issues for minor
> improvements.
>
> Also mmamkin connected with me directly and also suggested to use prefix
> "pg-" for whole library not only for public functions. I think that I
> probably should to use namespaces to hide private functions. It would be
> nice if someone would share with me best practice for using them bcs I
> still do not have deep understanding in their usage.
>
> There is also a "postgresql-hackers" mailing list where devs discuss not
> only DBMS development but also clients and adapters implementation. So I
> think I should to share lib with them also, it probably will draw some
> attention to language itself and devs from pg community will advice
> something. What you think?
>
> Thanks.
> *From:* r...@tamos.net
> *Sent:* 16 January 2019 16:04
> *To:* picolisp@software-lab.de
> *Reply to:* picolisp@software-lab.de
> *Subject:* Re: pgint.l
>
> +1 for writing tests.
> +1 for using aw-‘s test harness.
> +1 for having a sane license.
>
> Huzzah! :)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:11 +0300, Abel Normand wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm happy to announce that I released my small library to interfacing
> with
> > PostgreSQL -- https://gitlab.com/Abel-ze-Normand/pgint.l . I tried to
> keep
> > its implementation as simple as possible.
> >
> > I'm open to your suggestions for future improvements and your
> > contributions.
> > --
> > Best regards, Nail
>
>

Reply via email to