On Jan 15, 5:04 am, Ryan Freckleton <ryan.freckle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello PIDA developers and community, > > One of my coworkers (Tim Flink, who wrote this list earlier) and I are > interested in developing Java support for PIDA with the goal of using it as > our primary java IDE. > > If we succeed in adding this support, would you be interested in receiving > our patches into mainline? We're planning doing our work in public branches > on bitbucket and keeping them synced with main. Yup, we are interested
> This assumes that our code is up to par with quality, tests, etc. Tests is still a big grey area, quality is a moving target we attack via peer-review. I'd happy to provide additional review for you, if requested. The basic premise Sounds fine, we might want to investigate on running java-related things via a execnet->jython bridge. We currently lack a concept of generic build systems, so currently it would be necessary to indirect via puilder (our simple builtin task-based build tool) At some point i plan to make the Project support build tool agnostic, so java based Projects could directly use ant/maven.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PIDA" group. To post to this group, send an email to p...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pida+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pida?hl=en-GB.
