[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630686#action_12630686
]
Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-364:
------------------------------------
Would the following work:
If a limit is present, always add an MR state with single reducer unless the
whole plan is already terminated by a single reducer?
> Limit return incorrect records when we use multiple reducer
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-364
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: impl
> Affects Versions: types_branch
> Reporter: Daniel Dai
> Assignee: Shravan Matthur Narayanamurthy
> Fix For: types_branch
>
> Attachments: PIG-364.patch
>
>
> Currently we put Limit(k) operator in the reducer plan. However, in the case
> of n reducer, we will get up to n*k output.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
