On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
>
> This mostly reverts bd096a8a, but it keeps the subtest reporting.  The
> non-idomatic way this test was implemented was causing confusion for at
> least one new piglit developer.
>
> v2: Rebase on top of 3c21a59.

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit

Reply via email to