Isn't this why we were using posixpath explicitly? On Nov 23, 2014 7:15 AM, "Emil Velikov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/11/14 09:46, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > On 22/11/14 19:36, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Seemingly this is sufficient for a Windows piglit run/result file to be > >> ran under Linux and the correct directory structure (and html) to be > >> generated. > >> > >> Unfortunately my python-fu is a bit short so I'm not sure if(how much) > >> this will backfire when used on Windows with either Linux or Windows > >> result file. > >> > >> v2: Attempt to handle Linux results on Windows. > > > > I think v2 is not necessary. '/' should work just fine. But without > > testing I can't claim I'm sure. > > > temp_path is used to create the path via makedirs a few lines below. > Considering how picky the latter is, on Linux, I've decided to go the > explicit route :P Will try to give it a test some time in the week. > > -Emil > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit >
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
