I thought these would have been caught by gen_conversion.py :/
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> On 24/02/17 01:20, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Seriously, 100000000000 is not the only 64-bit integer. We should test a few more of them. These new integers trigger a bug in the GLSL IR int64 lowering code. Cc: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com> --- generated_tests/builtin_function.py | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/generated_tests/builtin_function.py b/generated_tests/builtin_function.py index 663d9d8..a5eafb2 100644 --- a/generated_tests/builtin_function.py +++ b/generated_tests/builtin_function.py @@ -1309,8 +1309,28 @@ def _make_vector_or_matrix_test_vectors(test_suite_dict): [ 0.14, 0.18, -0.56], [ 0.40, -0.77, 1.76]]), # mat3x4 ] - int64s = [np.int64(x) for x in [0, -100000000000, 100000000000]] - uint64s = [np.uint64(x) for x in [0, 10, 100000000000]] + + int64s = [np.int64(x) for x in [ + 0, + 3, + -1192, + 1048576, + 4251475, + 29852643761, + -4398046511104, + -3948976685146, + -135763469567146206]] + uint64s = [np.uint64(x) for x in [ + 0, + 3, + 1192, + 1048576, + 4251475, + 29852643761, + 4398046511104, + 3948976685146, + 135763469567146206, + 11654173250180970009]]int64vecs = [np.array([-10, -12], dtype=np.int64),
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
