Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 18:17:19) > On 15/06/17 10:57, Dylan Baker wrote: > > I have (a now fairly old) series to port either the arb fp or vp tests to > > shader_runner on the list. I have no idea how much work they'd need to > > land, or > > if they're really relavent. > > > > Ian had patches (I have no idea how far done) to generate arb_fp and arb_vp > > tests which would superscede both glean and my work. I don't think those > > patches > > ever went to the list or how much work was remaining. > > They seem mostly ok, and I'd been keen to land them but there are > comments about changing the input/output values that were never addressed.
I think I mostly got side tracked with other things. I'll have a look back through the comments and see about re-spinning when I have a chance. > > Was there any reason for not sending a new series? As far as I can see > it shouldn't be too much work to get these commit worthy. > > > > > > Dylan > > > > Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 17:48:24) > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I recently got a cpu with more than 2 cores \o/ and it's become even > >> more obvious just how much of a bottle neck the glean tests are. > >> > >> Anyway what is the currently status of the rewrite? Have all the current > >> patches landed or are there still patchs waiting review/yet to be finished? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tim > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Piglit mailing list > >> Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
