On 14.08.2018 23:07, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 08/14/2018 12:41 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107550
---
.../spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/invalid-array-as-function-param.vert | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
tests/spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/invalid-array-as-function-param.vert
diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/invalid-array-as-function-param.vert
b/tests/spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/invalid-array-as-function-param.vert
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d285680de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/invalid-array-as-function-param.vert
I was thinking maybe dereference-scalar-as-array-for-... The we can
also have dereference-scalar-as-array-for-assignment,
dereference-scalar-as-array-for-operation, etc. I can write those
later, if you like.
Sure, I'll rename it.
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// [config]
+// expect_result: fail
+// glsl_version: 1.10
+// [end config]
+
If you add
void func(int x)
{
return;
}
so that there's only one compilation error,
Will do!
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
+void main()
+{
+ func(0[2]);
+}
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
