Actually a non-profit organisation seems better than a foundation for
a live project like Pike. A foundation is typically used by dead
people who insist they must have a say in how their money is
spent. This means that the charter of a foundation is a write-once
regret-forever affair. Hence it is very important to get right at the
first try.

A non-profit organisation is on the other hand easy to create and can
be adapted according to the wishes of its live, active members.

There already exists a non-profit organisation where Pike was born (or
at least its direct precursor), that has handled money ear-marked for
projects responsibly in the past and where most of the swdish Pike
developers are still members: Lysator. Has anyone checked with the
current board if Lysator can help solve the current problem?
        • ... Marc Dirix
        • ... H. William Welliver III
        • ... Martin Bähr
        • ... H. William Welliver III
        • ... Martin Bähr
        • ... James Neil Tyson
        • ... Martin Bähr
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
        • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Mattias Wingstedt (Firefruit) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Johan Sundstr�m (Achtung Liebe!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Bähr
    • ... Bill Welliver
      • ... Martin Bähr
  • Re:... Bill Welliver
  • Re:... Martin Bähr

Reply via email to