or maybe isdestructed(), etc? not having a qualifier might tend to suggest to the initiated that undefined() generates an undefined value rather than test for it. but, that could just be an educational point.

bill

On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:

I've already implemented undefinedp() and destructedp(), but I feel
they are a bit clumsy to write. Perhaps remove the "p"?

!DSPAM:4742addd14298724344031!

        • ... Martin Bähr
      • ... Martin Baehr
      • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Bähr
          • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... H. William Welliver III
              • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... H. William Welliver III
    • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Pik... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... H. William Welliver III
      • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to