Martin Stjernholm,  Roxen IS @ Pike  developers forum wrote:
>An all-on/all-off switch doesn't sound particularly useful. It's for
>each individual argument one wants to make the decision whether it's
>intended to remain unused or not.

What about something similar to __attribute__(unused) like gcc has?

E.g.  int somefunc(int __attribute__(unused) level, int depth) { }

in order to suppress warnings for "int level".
-- 
Sincerely,                                                          [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

A sign seen at the local pizza place: "DO NOT CARRY TAKE-OUT BOXES BY HANDLES"
  • Unused variables Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
    • Unused variable... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
      • Unused vari... Marcus Agehall (Roxen IS) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • Unused ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
          • Unu... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
        • Unused ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
          • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
  • Re: Unused variables Mirar @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to