On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:20:04PM +0000, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail 
Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
> Well, that makes sense I guess.  Btw, what is the difference (implied
> by the convention) between "master" and "HEAD"?

master is just a default branch name and completely irrelevant if you
don't want to use it (i actually think stephen should remove the master
branch from the git repo, since it doesn't make much sense for us)

HEAD is name for the current active, checked out commit. it is not a
branch. if you switch branches, then your HEAD changes. (see git reflog
for where HEAD has been)
there should not actually be a branch with that name, i wonder what
happened here. stephen?

greetings, martin.
  • Re:... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Baehr
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Git Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Bähr
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Re:... Martin Bähr
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Baehr
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Baehr
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Baehr
  • Re:... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to