On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:35:03PM +0000, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum wrote: > > /.../ the reverse takes little time compared to the search. > Right.. If that were true, it'd be a very bad outcome indeed for all > Hubbes efforts optimizing that beast.
if what were true? or is there a 'not' missing? (if it were not true that reverse() takes little time) would a reverse_search() be much faster than search(reverse()) even if it is less optimized than search()? greetings, martin.
