Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike  developers forum wrote:
>Hmm, considering the debug check at svalue.c:2316 it must happen while
>the object is in the queue, and that should be easy to check. Here's a
>patch that strengthens those debug checks. Could you please try it? Be
>prepared to back it out quickly though, because I'm not entirely sure
>it's correct (that o->next != o condition is suspicious).

Running with it since last night.  So far, so good.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
  • GC fatal Stephen R. van den Berg
    • Re: GC fatal Stephen R. van den Berg
      • Re: GC fatal Stephen R. van den Berg
        • Re: GC f... Stephen R. van den Berg
          • Re: ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to