Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: >By the way, I think that for the same reason Substitution shouldn't be >in Crypto either. It can only protect against accidental loss of >confidentiality, not malicious.
In the same vein, CRC functions can be considered weak ciphers. So, I retract my earlier support for not placing it under Crypto, and suggest we add them under Crypto since they are useful on similar streams and essentially need the same interface(s). -- Stephen. Every successful person has had failures but repeated failure is no guarantee of eventual success.
