As it turns out from the testsuite, there's one problem with this
optimization: When the duplicate-tracking mapping is allocated, it's
not propagated upward so that the same instance in another part of the
tree is detected.

I can see two ways to fix it: Either by making a double indirection
for the mapping pointer, or by going back to allocating the mapping at
the top. The latter isn't as silly as it first appears, since only a
single fixed-size mapping struct is allocated as long as no inserts
are done during the process. It might beat the overhead of the extra
indirection and the additional checks required.
              • ... Tor Edvardsson @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
  • ... Arne Goedeke
    • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Tor Edvardsson @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Marcus Agehall (nu med K-m�rkt fastighet och ny elcentral) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to