can you elaborate on that please?

what else beyond somethig like 
typedef function|Callable callable; would be needed? (where Callable
refers to the class example i made earlier)

do you mean it would not be easy to write tests for the implementation
of a callable type?
and what is incomplete about callablep()? also the tests?

or do you mean something else?
(why should dificulty of writing tests prevent implementation of a
feature?)

greetings, martin.
  • Re:... Lance Dillon
    • ... Marc Dirix
      • ... Lance Dillon
      • ... Martin Bähr
        • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
          • ... Martin Baehr
            • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
                • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Martin Baehr
                • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to