I second that; rebasing and cherry picking is the way to go.

It's a pity that git still hasn't learned Origin headers when cherry
picking, though. But this way of recording the patch relations is
simply too clumsy imo.

At least this method didn't give false merge relations between the
main branches. That is something I'd consider bad enough to actually
warrant backing up branch heads on the server, since it'd bring in all
commits from another branch when listing the history of one branch.
It'd be nice if githelper could be extended to block such merges, i.e.
if a commit moves the merge base between any two main (X.Y-style)
branches, it's blocked.
  • mer... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to