On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum wrote:
In any case, suggestions on how to achieve a good process for both
Pike and standalone releases are more than welcome.
Maybe a reasonable compromise is to include it in Pike as a git
submodule then? One would still need to clone the separate GJAlloc
repo to be able to hack on it, but it'd avoid the bundle step at
least. I don't have any direct experience with git submodules though,
so I don't know how easy they are to work with.
Sharing the ACLs with Pike would be nice if you're ok with it.
Wouldn't the simplest way to achieve that be to use
pike-git.lysator.liu.se for GJAlloc as well?
yes, sharing acls and putting it there sounds good.
I also like the idea of having it as a submodule, but I have also never used
them. I remember grubba saying on the chat that its better to avoid them...
