"Stephen R. van den Berg" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most logical would be under a module named IO, so it would
> become IO.USB.devices and IO.OneWire.devices or somesuch.

IO sounds like a container module for all things i/o, but in reality
there's already a whole lot of i/o elsewhere (Stdio, Protocols, ...). Do
you have any coherent vision for what this new container would contain
and not contain?

(Personally I favor a very flat namespace - the top level is afterall
the most convenient one, so let's use it. ;) I've never understood the
benefit of Standards.pmod, in particular.)
  • USB.devices... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • USB.de... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • Re... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • Re: US... Martin Stjernholm
      • Re... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
          • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to