On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum <[email protected]> wrote: >>This looks like a good opportunity to mention a few patches that I >>haven't heard back regarding. They're mostly fairly trivial/simple. Is >>there a better way to suggest patches than posting them to this list >>or pike@roxen? > > Either works. > > Applied all of them except for the low_read_file() patch, > which I fail to see a reason for.
Thanks! That was to cure a compiler warning using gcc on OS/2, if I recall correctly. Not a big deal, was just a "try to make sure things are safe" check. Unlikely - if even possible - to make a difference on any actually-supported platform. ChrisA
